The 2025 NBA Draft is here and as we all expected, Cooper Flagg was the first overall selection. After a night of surprises in Round 1, who are the top remaining players for Round 2?
Our tracker below will highlight the players who remain and their original ranking on our 2025 NBA Draft Big Board. For the full, live results and to simulate the rest of the draft, head over to PFSN’s Free NBA Mock Draft Simulator now!
Bookmark our simulator as we’ll debut our 2026 NBA Draft Rankings immediately following Round 2 of the 2025 NBA Draft.
[EDITOR’S NOTE: The players below will be highlighted with their original ranking on our big board.]
21) Kam Jones, PG/SG, Marquette
One of the top returning guards in the 2025 NBA Draft class, Kam Jones brings a seasoned, crafty combo-guard game that thrives on shot creation and natural playmaking feel. He’s a polished, skilled scorer with a well-rounded offensive bag, floaters, pull-ups, off-ball movement, all built on a foundation of IQ and experience.
His athletic ceiling and a recent dip in shooting efficiency may temper some of the “lead guard” upside talk, but Jones remains a plug-and-play option thanks to his mature approach and readiness to contribute. He’s the kind of guard who knows how to operate within a system and elevate others without needing high usage.
Defensively, he brings active feet, strength, and the desire to compete. He’s not just there to stay in front — he applies pressure and disrupts rhythm with intent.
Surrounded by NBA-level talent in a more natural secondary role, Jones profiles as a steady contributor in a rotation, providing scoring depth, smart reads, and backcourt versatility.
If he can tighten his handle and improve defensive consistency, there’s a long-term lane for him at the next level.
22) Noah Penda, SF/PF, Le Mans Sarthe
Noah Penda is an NBA-ready forward with exceptional physical tools, defensive versatility, and a high motor. At 6’8″ and 225 pounds with a 7-foot wingspan, the 20-year-old Frenchman is a dynamic presence on both ends of the court, already playing with the instincts of a veteran. His defensive impact, energy, and high-level playmaking potential firmly position him as one of the most intriguing international prospects in the 2025 NBA Draft.
Penda excels in passing lanes, as a weak-side shot blocker, and as a switchable defender. While his offensive game is still developing and he’ll need to add strength to compete, his size, length, and versatility consistently provide a solid foundation for a role as a 3-and-D forward with secondary playmaking upside. If he can significantly improve his shooting consistency and tighten his ball-handling, Penda has the potential to carve out a long and impactful career in the modern NBA. His unselfish game and defensive utility suggest he could be worth the investment.
28) Ryan Kalkbrenner, C, Creighton
Ryan Kalkbrenner brings value as a throwback 7-footer with a modern twist. A dominant interior presence on the defensive end, he was the backbone of Creighton’s defense and a three-time Big East Defensive Player of the Year for a reason: elite rim protection, excellent timing, and complete ownership of the paint.
He’s a true anchor with size and length that translates, easily altering shots and erasing mistakes around him. Offensively, he plays within himself — an efficient finisher on rolls and post touches with soft hands and the ability to absorb contact.
Though primarily a paint-based big, Kalkbrenner’s game has evolved. He’s added a reliable mid-range jumper and has started to stretch the floor with occasional range beyond the arc, opening the door to stretch-five potential.
There are mobility concerns, particularly when forced into space or defending switches, but his basketball IQ, interior polish, and expanding jumper make him a viable long-term piece.
If the shot keeps trending upward and he lands in a system that protects him defensively, Kalkbrenner could find a niche as a dependable rotational big with real impact.
29) Rocco Zikarsky, C, Brisbane
Rocco Zikarsky is an intriguing young center with elite size, mobility, and rim-protecting instincts, though his draft buzz has somewhat cooled recently due to a knee injury that cut his NBL season short. He has the physical tools and foundational skills of a traditional center. Those traits make him an attractive prospect for teams that need a true big man.
At 7’3″ with a 7’5″ wingspan, Zikarsky presents as a natural lob threat, pick-and-roll presence, and shot-blocker. His domineering physical stature provides an immediate advantage, making him a formidable presence in the paint. He also has solid hands and footwork around the rim and good mobility for his size.
Zikarsky’s long-term value will hinge on his ability to expand his offensive game beyond simple interior touches, improve his shooting consistency, and expand his defensive versatility. He’s only 18, so he has time to develop, but he’ll need to demonstrate significant growth to reach his potential as an impactful big man at the next level.
31) Jamir Watkins, SG/SF, Florida State
Jamir Watkins is a long, physical wing with the makeup of a two-way contributor in today’s NBA. He brings toughness, feel, and versatility — the kind of traits that translate into a valuable role player early on. While he may lack the ceiling of younger, high-upside prospects, Watkins’ maturity, motor, and all-around game give him real plug-and-play appeal.
Defensively, Watkins stands out. He takes pride in guarding multiple positions, competes on the perimeter, and consistently gets into passing lanes. That combination of size, instincts, and effort could make him a coveted wing defender at the next level.
Offensively, he thrives as a slasher, aggressive downhill, comfortable attacking off the catch, and capable of finishing through contact. The concern lies in the jumper. He connected on just 32.5% from deep across four seasons and 75.8% from the line, and hasn’t shown much consistency as a finisher at the rim.
Still, if Watkins can improve his shooting efficiency and touch around the basket, his defensive versatility and competitive edge give him a pathway to stick as a rotational wing in the league.
32) Chaz Lanier, SG, Tennessee
Chaz Lanier emerged as one of the most prolific shooters in college basketball this past season, shooting 39.5% from behind the 3-point line. Beyond his catch-and-shoot prowess, he’s a tough shot-maker, displaying an ability to create his own offense. After four years at North Florida, Lanier truly thrived at Tennessee, proving that he can hold his own against elite college competition.
Despite his top-tier shooting ability, Lanier’s game isn’t without its flaws. At 6’4”, he’s a bit undersized as a shooting guard, and he lacks the ideal play strength for the position. While he can get his own shot, he’s inconsistent as a ball-handler, limiting his ability to create for others. Lanier’s size and strength deficiencies can also make him a liability on the defensive end of the floor. His ability to counteract these flaws will dictate his ceiling. Either way, Lanier’s shot-making ability is his path to finding a role in the NBA, as he can offer immediate offensive firepower and floor spacing.
33) Adou Thiero, SF/PF, Arkansas
Adou Thiero is a fascinating developmental prospect, a former high school guard turned physically imposing forward with the kind of frame and athletic pop that immediately stands out.
Measured at over 6’6” with a 7-foot wingspan and a chiseled 218-pound build, Thiero brings an NBA-ready body and the kind of explosive athleticism that flashes in transition and on straight-line drives.
As a slasher, he’s a battering ram with an explosive first step and real vertical juice. He’s also an elite offensive rebounder for his position, routinely outworking opponents with effort and strength.
Defensively, he brings switchability and presence. Thiero’s combination of size, lateral mobility, and physicality allows him to guard multiple spots and make an impact on the glass, in passing lanes, and on-ball.
The swing skill — and it’s a big one — is the jumper. He shot just 28.4% from three over his college career, dipping to 25.6% last season, and his 71.1% mark at the line doesn’t inspire much confidence either. Without a consistent shot, spacing becomes an issue.
Still, Thiero’s defensive versatility, athletic tools, and high motor give him a real shot to stick, but his long-term upside hinges on unlocking even a passable perimeter game.
34) Johni Broome, C, Auburn
Johni Broome is a seasoned and versatile big man whose game is NBA-ready. A super senior, Broome’s decision to return to Auburn for one final season allowed him to refine his game, and he now enters the draft as one of the most polished big men in the class.
He’s strong in the paint as a low-post scorer, a rebounder, and a rim protector, and he consistently dominates the glass on both ends of the court, thanks to his physical strength and positioning.
Any team that doesn’t draft Johni Broome is missing out. Dude is baller from the post. Here’s him dominating a very good Michigan State team en route to the Final Four.
And he’s got a better vertical than Jokic. pic.twitter.com/geMvtWJD6R
— Sir Barnsalot (@barnsalot) June 20, 2025
Broome’s perimeter shooting is a significant concern, though, especially in the modern NBA game. He made just 27.8% of his 3-point attempts in 2024, and his career mark finished at 30.2%. Despite being a good shot blocker, he has limited defensive versatility due to his average athleticism.
As a result, he could struggle trying to guard on the perimeter at the next level. Those challenges are concerning, but his high basketball IQ, toughness, and ability to impact the game on both ends make him a viable option for teams looking to add frontcourt depth.
36) Bogoljub Markovic, C, Mega Basket
Bogoljub Markovic is the latest skilled big man to emerge from Serbia’s Mega Basket pipeline, a program well-known for producing NBA-ready talent. The near 7-footer turned heads at the Nike Hoop Summit with his competitive fire and fearlessness, playing with intensity and showing flashes of high-level offensive polish.
Offensively, Markovic projects as a floor-spacing big with upside in pick-and-pop and short-roll situations. He knocked down 39.4% of his catch-and-shoot threes this past year, with a jump shot that features a high release and minimal wasted motion.
He’s also a crafty post scorer who can put the ball in the basket with either hand. He’ll need to tighten his handle and improve his decision-making, but he’s shown an ability to make plays as a passer.
On the defensive end, Markovic’s impact is more limited. While he competes and makes smart rotations, his slender frame makes him vulnerable in physical matchups. He’s more of a positional defender than a playmaker on that end, so he’ll need to maximize his offensive skill set to earn consistent minutes.
38) Javon Small, PG, West Virginia
Javon Small is a dynamic, tough-nosed guard. He lacks ideal size at just 6’2″, but what he lacks in height, he makes up for with his feel for the game and competitive nature. A four-year college player, Small developed into a steady lead guard with high-level shot-making ability and a relentless motor, consistently stepping up in big moments and carrying a massive workload for a West Virginia team riddled with injuries.
Offensively, Small is a well-rounded and explosive threat. He shot 42.5% on catch-and-shoot threes and 87.1% from the line as a senior. He has deep range, and he’s especially lethal out of the pick-and-roll. His downhill game is also a strength, as he uses his strength and craftiness to draw fouls at a high rate.
Defensively, Small’s energy makes him a pest on that end of the floor. Despite his size, he’s physical and plays with discipline. Ultimately, his size may cap his ceiling in the eyes of some teams, but his production, competitiveness, and ability to both create and play off the ball give him a real shot to carve out a rotational role in the NBA.
39) Hunter Sallis, SG/SF, Wake Forest
Hunter Sallis, known for his poise, smooth three-level scoring, and defensive energy, is one of the most polished upperclassmen in this year’s class. Sallis has grown into a crafty shot creator with a deceptive handle and advanced change-of-pace moves that allow him to navigate defenders and create quality looks off the dribble.
He’s especially effective in the midrange. Offensively, Sallis thrives as a slasher, showing off his finesse as a finisher. He has elite touch around the basket, using a mix of floaters, off-foot layups, and creative body control to score. Though more scorer than facilitator, he’s shown unselfish instincts as a passer.
Defensively, Sallis brings consistent intensity and discipline. His activity level fighting around screens and sticking with his assignment speaks to his awareness and motor. However, his lean frame remains a concern. He’ll need to get stronger to hold up physically against NBA athletes, especially when switching or guarding more physical wings.
Where Sallis can take a step forward is as a shooter. His three-point shooting hovered around 33.3% over four seasons. If the outside shot becomes more reliable, he has the potential to grow from a secondary scoring option into a legitimate offensive weapon.F
41) Mark Sears, PG, Alabama
Mark Sears was one of college basketball’s most prolific shot-makers. The Alabama star is known for his fearless mentality, advanced handle, and deep shooting range. Though he measured in well under 6’0”, Sears plays more physical than his size suggests.
His sturdy frame helps him absorb contact at the rim, while his creativity and footwork allow him to create space and hit difficult shots from nearly anywhere on the floor. Sears brings a scoring arsenal that few guards in this class can match.
That said, Sears faces a steep path to NBA minutes due to his physical limitations. He lacks elite burst or vertical pop, making it tougher to consistently finish against NBA length.
On the defensive end, his size and short wingspan make him a frequent target, and while he competes, his ability to stay in front of bigger, more athletic guards at the next level remains a question mark.
To stick in the league, Sears will need to continue to work on his decision-making and maintain his shooting efficiency under increased pressure. In the short-term, he has the tools to become an energizing scoring guard off the bench in the NBA.
42) Dink Pate, PG, Capitanes
Dink Pate is one of the youngest and most polarizing prospects in this year’s draft class. A 6’8” wing with impressive fluidity and athleticism, Pate possesses physical tools that fit the mold of a modern NBA perimeter player.
His early exposure to professional basketball through the G League Ignite and Mexico City Capitanes gave him valuable reps against seasoned competition, but also highlighted how raw his game still is.
Offensively, Pate shows the ability to score at all three levels. He’s comfortable with the ball in his hands and has a deep bag of moves. However, his efficiency leaves much to be desired. At the rim, he struggles with touch. His decision-making and shot selection remain works in progress as well.
2024 5 Dink Pate (@IAMTHESHOOTER1) is having an outstanding junior season at Pinkston (TX)
Through 30 games, Pate is averaging 22.6 PPG, 12.4 RPG, 6.0 APG, 2.0 SPG, and 2.0 BPG
6’8 guard that is a true playmaker pic.twitter.com/6bJXmta3Ws
— Alex Karamanos (@KaramanosAlex) February 9, 2023
Defensively, Pate has the physical profile to be versatile. He’s long, mobile, and able to switch, but he lacks the awareness and anticipation to consistently impact plays. That said, his frame and athletic tools give reason for optimism if placed in the right developmental system.
Pate is a long-term bet. He hasn’t produced consistently in two years of pro play, but his age, size, and flashes of skill make him a moldable prospect. He’s best suited for a team with patience and a strong player development program.
43) RJ Luis, SG/SF, St. John’s
After transferring to St. John’s, RJ Luis Jr. showcased his toughness and versatility under Rick Pitino, earning recognition for his ability to guard multiple positions and make winning plays on both ends.
His aggressive, downhill attacking style sets the tone, especially in transition or when cutting into open space. He also brings surprising post-up ability for a wing, using his frame and footwork to bully smaller defenders in the paint.
Defensively, Luis has the lateral quickness to stay in front of guards and the size and tenacity to battle wings, making him a switchable piece who can disrupt passing lanes and compete on the glass. His motor never wavers, and he relishes the challenge of locking in on his man or making help-side plays.
His rebounding and overall activity level consistently impact the game, even when his offense stalls.
That said, Luis’s offensive game is still a work in progress. Despite being a confident midrange scorer, his efficiency remains an issue. To stick at the next level, Luis must simplify his offensive approach and improve his shooting mechanics and ball-handling.
Still, Luis’s mindset, defensive versatility, and physical tools are NBA-caliber. He has a pathway to becoming a reliable two-way role player.
44) Alex Toohey, SF/PF, Sydney
At 21 years old, Toohey contributed to the NBL’s Sydney Kings after he decided not to follow through on his commitment to college basketball’s Gonzaga Bulldogs. He was a role player on the wing, spacing the floor with a beautiful shooting stroke and showing competitiveness on the defensive end of the floor.
That’s seen as the side of the ball where he’ll struggle, as his athleticism is limited despite having positional size (6’8”) and a solid wingspan (6’11”). Toohey is comfortable handling the ball in the open floor and is unselfish in finding his teammates for open looks.
Outside of that, his ceiling as an offensive prospect isn’t viewed as very high, as he’ll stretch the defense from beyond the arc but struggles to find shots elsewhere. His age is also something teams will consider, as he’s a raw prospect but two, or even three years older than some other prospects who are at the same stage skill-wise in their career.
45) Koby Brea, SG/SF, Kentucky
Brea is a bona fide sharp-shooter, excelling best as a complementary piece on the wing.
Having spent four seasons with the Dayton Flyers and his final season with the Kentucky Wildcats, he’s a mature and experienced prospect who isn’t seen as having a particularly high ceiling, but could contribute as a role player early in his career as a floor-spacer.
Though his blistering 43.5% from three-point range and 11.6 points per game were certainly beneficial for the Wildcats, he struggled to defend against SEC-level talent. His lack of athleticism, straight-line speed, and lateral quickness are seen as what will put a cap on his ceiling and could result in him being a situational liability at the next level if teams attack him on switches.
Brea would best fit into a team that has a solid rim-protector as the backline of defense and a primary creator who is known for finding shooters, as the 6’5” wing is unlikely to be able to create his own shot in the NBA.
46) Maxime Raynaud, C, Stanford
Raynaud impressed at the combine, measuring in at 7’0” barefoot with a 7’1” wingspan, and he excelled during the scrimmage portion of the event. He showed off all the offensive skills that inspire belief that he could be a rotational big man in the league.
While he doesn’t have the top-level explosion above the rim that scouts covet, he makes up for it with crafty footwork and an understanding of angles that allows him to penetrate the basket where his deceptive speed comes in handy against opposing centers. He was the focal point of the Cardinal offense, averaging 20.2 points and 10.6 rebounds per game in the ACC.
Where he’ll contribute most in the NBA will be with his rebounding, shot-blocking (1.4 blocks per game last season) and three-point stroke (34.7% on 5.5 attempts per game). The four-year college center played so well at the combine that some scouts and analysts believe he could be a first-round pick, as his game translated well to the pro style of play, albeit in a small sample size.
47) Kobe Johnson, SF, UCLA
Johnson projects as primarily a defensive stopper. His 6’6”, 200-pound frame and wingspan allow him to disrupt offensive players, as evidenced by his 1.6 steals per game for the Bruins last year.
A three-year starter for the USC Trojans before finishing his career at UCLA, he never quite grew into a quality offensive player, instead finding success rebounding the ball and in breakaway situations.
He also averaged 2.9 assists per game as a senior, showing off his unselfishness and court vision. A 36.2% three-point shooter, he was often reluctant to shoot and didn’t seem confident with his shooting stroke, but decent efficiency is there.
For him to earn minutes at the next level, he’ll need to improve that aspect of his game. While he’s a good defender, the modern NBA requires shooting, or else Johnson could get played off the court if he’s given a shot in the rotation.
48) Sion James, SF, Duke
James was a key role player for the Blue Devils last season, contributing 8.6 points, 4.2 rebounds and 2.9 assists per game in his fifth year at the collegiate level. But that doesn’t tell the whole story, as his defense is what sticks out the most.
Measuring in just below 6’5” and 217 pounds at the combine, he has the frame to be a high-level defender in the NBA. Add in that he’s naturally physical and has the athleticism to keep up with faster players, and James is a guy in the second round who could be a rotational piece in the future.
Sion James in Sweet 16 & Elite 8 to help Duke reach Final Four:
12.5 PPG
78% FG (7 for 9)
75% 3PT (3 for 4)
80% FT (8 for 10)
+25 (T-Team High w/ Flagg)
Team best +22 v Alabama16 Pts v Arizona tied season-high
Sion is San Antonio bound@ipopStats
pic.twitter.com/PgJqfSJvqx https://t.co/LcifoRCJXZ— Jack Benjamin (@JackBenjaminPxP) March 30, 2025
To reach his ceiling, he’ll have to further improve his shooting after taking just 1.9 three-point attempts per game at Duke. At this point, his only additive skill offensively is his unselfishness, as he’s more than willing to move the ball.
His ceiling isn’t high due to his limitations on offense, but James would be a solid flier addition late in the draft, with hopes that his game translates to the next level as a lockdown defender.
50) Cameron Matthews, SF/PF, Mississippi State
A five-year man who started 120 games in his career for the Bulldogs, Matthews is a physical presence in every sense. At 6’7”, 235 pounds, the power forward has a great core of strength that he used to average 6.7 rebounds per game last season, despite being undersized in many of his positional matchups.
Where he excels is on the defensive end of the floor, where his IQ, matched with excellent hands (2.4 steals per game last season), made him one of the top defenders in the SEC. He’s quick-footed, disallowing the opposition to drive by him.
It’s tough to project Matthews as a high-level offensive player in the NBA, as he shot just 24.0% from three-point range last season on 0.7 attempts per game. He was largely a non-factor offensively outside of put-backs and run-outs, which is an immediate concern as far as how his game will translate.
But if the former Mississippi State forward lands with a team willing to play him to his strengths, he could carve out a spot as a situational defender and fill in as a small-ball center.
51) Eric Dixon, SF/PF, Villanova
Dixon led the country in scoring last season at Villanova, averaging 23.3 points per game while also grabbing 5.1 rebounds. He scored in a variety of ways, getting to the line for 6.1 free throw attempts per game and knocking down 40.7% of his 7.2 three-point attempts.
While he was one of the top players in college basketball, the 6’8”, nearly 260-pound forward doesn’t project as a top scorer in the NBA due to his lack of explosiveness and height as a small-ball center or stretch four.
He’s not particularly strong defensively either. He’ll likely struggle to stay in front of quicker players, while not having the size to out- rebound taller players down low.
His shooting does present hope that he could become a rotational piece in the NBA, as he could contribute in a small role as a backup big man with rim protection behind him.
52) Tyrese Proctor, PG/SG, Duke
A former five-star prospect out of high school, Proctor never quite realized his potential after spending three seasons with the Blue Devils. Coming to Duke from Australia, Proctor is an athletic guard standing 6’6” who can attack the basket, yet struggles to finish around the rim.
Despite shooting 40.5% from deep during his junior season, his outside shot needs work. As a solid on-ball defender who used his length well, his ceiling is probably as a 3-and-D type of player. The talent was clearly there, but decision-making questions and a seemingly uneven confidence level held Proctor back from playing up to his talents as a dynamic slasher from the combo guard position.
Despite being 21 years old, it’s hard to see Proctor contributing to an NBA rotation early in his career, as he’ll likely spend time in the G League further developing his game.
53) Payton Sandfort, SF, Iowa
Sandfort was the primary creator for the Hawkeyes during his senior season, averaging 16.7 points, 6.0 rebounds, and 2.9 assists while standing 6’8”. At the next level, he’s likely to be put in a floor-spacing wing position, where his true strength can be accentuated most: shooting.
The percentages don’t do it justice, as he knocked down just 34.0% of his triples last season on a bloated 7.5 attempts per game. Make no mistake, Sandfort is a sharp-shooter who isn’t afraid to pull from far behind the line, stretching the defense for teammates and himself to put the ball on the floor.
On defense, he wasn’t bad in the Big Ten, but Iowa often hid him to conserve energy for the other end of the court. NBA teams won’t do that, which means Sandfort will be required to show consistent defensive effort and energy if he wants a shot.
54) Jaxson Robinson, SG/SF, Kentucky
An injury cut Robinson’s senior season with the Wildcats short, but he did enough across his career to reveal himself as one of the top shooters in this draft class. On 6.9 attempts per game in 2024-25, he nailed 37.6% from deep while creating a number of those looks off the dribble.
At 6’6”, the swing player has good positional size and length and would fit right in on an NBA roster. If he is to reach his potential and be a rotational player at the next level, it’ll more than likely be as a 3-and-D player.
While he has the long-range shot down, his defense stands to improve. He has all the tools to be a competent defender and has provided bright flashes on that end, but wasn’t consistent enough to inspire belief that that’s who he’ll be every night.
The 22-year old Robinson is a player that could likely come in and compete from Day 1, but doesn’t have the long-term potential of other prospects at this point in the draft.
55) Grant Nelson, PF/C, Alabama
Nelson is one of the most versatile players in this class. He’s 6’10” with a 7’0” wingspan, and is very comfortable on the perimeter as well as down low.
To sum up the former Crimson Tide forward, he does everything at a proficient level, but doesn’t have one particular calling card skill to rely on – a double-edged sword for a prospect seen as a second-round pick.
If he lands with a team that believes in his ability as a connector on both ends of the floor, he could thrive and be a steal as a key cog for a decade or more in the league. But just as easily, he could be miscast as a small-ball big and resigned to the perimeter, where he isn’t a terrific shooter, and where he wouldn’t be able to use his size in the paint.
But if Nelson can be employed as Alabama used him – with a mix of both inside and outside play – he could surprise many.
56) Izan Almansa, PF/C, Perth
A 6’10”, 230-pound forward who can play center in some lineups, Almansa has put together a solid couple of seasons overseas, showcasing his ability to pass out of the high post, shoot the mid-range jumper, and rebound the ball with tremendous effort and hustle.
Additionally, he has a good feel for finding open spots in the paint, where his deft touch in the paint allows him to finish at a high rate. Where he struggles is shooting from long range, as he doesn’t have the best three-point form, and struggles as a free throw shooter.
Defensively in the paint, he’s not a shot-blocker and is resigned to drop coverage in the pick-and-roll due to his lack of lateral quickness.
Almansa has clear flaws, but he also flashes talent at 19 years old, he’s grown and become a better player over the years, and he’s potentially worth a late pick in this draft.
57) Micah Peavy, SG/SF, Georgetown
Peavy’s frame is NBA-ready right now, as he stands 6’8” and weighs 220 pounds. As a two-guard for the Hoyas and projecting as a small forward in the pros, he exhibits terrific positional size.
During his senior season at Georgetown, Peavy certainly wasn’t uncomfortable with the ball in his hands, scoring 17.2 points, grabbing 5.8 rebounds, and dishing out 3.6 assists as the head of the snake.
That’s not what he’ll be in the league, as he doesn’t have top-level talent and will need to learn how to play a role. His 40.0% three-point stroke will help him, albeit on just four attempts a night, as will his frame on the defensive end of the floor despite below-average foot speed and athleticism, which caps his ceiling.
What he will bring to a team, if drafted, is a mature prospect who’s been around the block, having played for three different programs.
58) Max Shulga, PG/SG, VCU
Shulga excelled during the past two seasons as the Rams’ lead ball-handler and creator, averaging 15.0 points, 5.9 rebounds, and 4.0 assists per game in 2024-25.
At 6’5”, he has good positional size for a point guard – although that may not be where he plays at the next level, as his lack of athleticism may be a problem against hounding defenders.
The Ukrainian native is more likely to serve in a wing role where his shooting (38.7% from deep last season) and pick-and-roll prowess can be accentuated the most. Shulga attacks angles at a high level, making up for his lack of quickness by getting to the paint at the right time and in the most efficient way possible.
He’s not a terrific defender, but certainly wasn’t a liability. His hands were great during his final season at VCU, as he nabbed 1.8 steals per game.
59) Jalon Moore, SF, Oklahoma
Moore was terrific last season for the Sooners, emerging as their go-to scorer on the wing. He specialized in slashing to the rim and using his 6’7”, 215-pound frame to either finish over or through defenders.
He’s extremely athletic, with a good first step attacking closeouts. Where he made major strides across his collegiate career was from behind the three-point line, as he converted on 38.1% of those shots during his senior season.
That’ll be something he’ll have to continue to hone in on, as he won’t have the ball in his hands nearly as much if he gets a chance in the league. He was a good-not-great defender, and often left something to be desired on that end.
He has a good left hand, which should result in more steals and blocks, but it didn’t always translate in college. For Moore to earn a long-term NBA roster spot, he’ll have to fully commit on that end of the floor.
60) Kadary Richmond, PG/SG, St. John’s
Richmond’s statline in 2024-25 was excellent for the Red Storm, as he averaged 12.4 points, 6.4 rebounds, and 5.3 assists. Standing 6’6”, he operated as the team’s point guard and nearly always had the size advantage over players defending him.
He used that to his advantage, seeing over the defense to find open teammates and finishing at the rim after slashing to the hoop. He was also a good on-ball defender, notching 2.0 steals per game as he showed he has the hands to compete at the next level. Where his ceiling is capped is at the three-point arc.
Though he eclipsed 40% at Seton Hall in 2022, he made an abysmal 17.5% in 2024-25. Add in that he converted just 53.6% of his free throws, and Richmond has a serious problem with his jumper.
Any sort of sustained success at the NBA level will hinge on him becoming a proficient shooter and rediscovering his 2022 form.
61) Caleb Love, PG/SG, Arizona
To casual college basketball fans, Love would likely be considered a lock to be a first-round pick. But the reality is that the five-year North Carolina Tar Heel (three seasons) and Arizona Wildcat (two seasons) was extremely inefficient at the collegiate level and doesn’t have the athletic ability to create shots in the NBA.
Handed the keys to the offense during his time with Arizona, Love rarely played off the ball and faces question marks over how he’ll adapt to playing a role. He can shoot the ball, but will need to clean up his efficiency.
Where he may find his niche is on defense, where he was extremely competitive late in games and showed anticipation in terms of staying in front of his opponent. But the question is if he can sustain that when not given primary volume on offense.
As it stands, Love risks going undrafted and having to work his way through the G League or playing overseas.
62) Zeke Mayo, PG/SG, Kansas
Mayo had a solid senior season with the Jayhawks, scoring 14.6 points per game while hitting 42.2% of his three-pointers. That’s the problem with his game, however; he doesn’t do much else besides shoot the ball, with many coming off of his own creation.
That’s not something that he did at a particularly high-level overall either, as he shot just 44.7% from the field and struggled to finish around the rim. He’s far from a dynamic athlete, leaving questions about how he’ll be able to defend quicker, more athletic players in the NBA.
His 6’4” height doesn’t suggest that he’ll have any advantage in that area either, as he’s strictly a two-guard with limited potential on both ends of the court.
Projected to go undrafted, Mayo will likely spend time in the G League or play overseas before he gets a shot in the NBA, if at all.
63) John Tonje, SG, Wisconsin
Tonje put together a terrific sixth-year senior season for the Badgers, leading the team in scoring and coming in second in rebounds. The 6’5” combo guard had the ball in his hands quite often as the engine behind Wisconsin’s offense.
Unfortunately for him, Tonje’s lack of athleticism doesn’t bode well for him having the same impact in the NBA, where he’ll likely have to fill a specific role. He did shoot 40.5% on catch-and-shoot looks last season, making it a possibility that he could transition into that role full-time.
At 6’5” and 218 pounds, he’ll enter the league with a mature frame and mature mentality after spending six seasons at the collegiate level. He doesn’t have a high ceiling, but could be a contributor on the court early in his career – a rarity for second-round picks.
64) Kobe Sanders, SG/SF, Nevada
After spending four seasons at Cal Poly, Sanders transferred to Nevada for his fifth-year senior season and excelled right away. He led the Wolfpack in scoring (15.8 points) and assists (4.5) while grabbing 3.9 rebounds per game.
At 6’9”, Sanders is an unorthodox player in that he’s very comfortable with the ball in his hands as the primary creator on the perimeter. He has a nice pull-up midrange jumper and got to his spots at a high rate in the Mountain West.
Where he’ll struggle – as many older prospects this late in the draft often do – is finding a role in the league, as he won’t have the ball in his hands every possession. His shooting isn’t great, as he connected on just 32.9% of his threes in his career.
He is a versatile defender, but gets pushed around against guys with more strength.
65) Alijah Martin, SG, Florida
The Gators wouldn’t have won the 2025 national title if not for Martin, who added 14.4 points and 4.5 rebounds per game along with hounding and physical defense. A five-year collegiate player, Martin is tightly packed at 6’2” and 210 pounds, making him stronger than nearly every player he matches up against.
Thank You Alijah Martin
Helped bring our defense from 94th to 6th and was a DAWG on both ends. pic.twitter.com/kpVwy42vNZ
— Florida Gators (@gatorsszn) April 10, 2025
While he uses that frame well defensively, he’s limited offensively and relied on others to create his looks last season. Primarily as a defender at the next level, Martin will have to overcome his height and length deficiency with high energy and competitiveness, two skills he exhibited at a high level last season.
His three-point shooting isn’t great, but could be good enough for teams not to ignore him completely. Outside of that, he doesn’t offer much on that end, capping his ceiling.
66) Brice Williams, SG/SF, Nebraska
Williams’ top skill is his scoring ability, as he averaged 20.4 points per game on 47.1% shooting from the field and 37.0% from three-point range. While that worked in college, he’s a below-average athlete and isn’t projected to be able to get his shots off in the same way at the next level.
In order for Williams to have success at the next level, he’s going to have to adapt into becoming a role player on the wing instead of a primary creator – a transition that many players fail to accomplish.
His size (6’7”, 214 pounds) gives him the frame of a solid team defender, which he revealed himself to be at times for the Cornhuskers last season. If Williams is to be selected in this draft, it’ll be late or he’ll go undrafted.
At 23 years old, he’s not viewed as having a high ceiling, but he could have a terrific career as a scorer overseas if the NBA doesn’t work out.
67) Vladislav Goldin, C, Michigan
Goldin is the prototypical big man who finishes well around the rim, rebounds well, and protects the paint. The problem for him is his dire lack of athleticism.
Adding to that, his 7’1”, 250-pound frame made him bigger than many of his college opponents, which was part of his success. But in the NBA, he won’t be the biggest guy on the court and even if he is, he won’t be the strongest.
He’s also expected to have a tough time guarding the pick-and-roll, as he has relatively slow feet.
On the bright side, there are a number of backup centers in the league who fill in for 10-15 minutes a night who have the same mold as Goldin, who could grow into that role with time.
68) Jaden Akins, SG/PG, Michigan State
Akins led the Spartans in scoring at 12.8 points per game during his senior season but struggled with efficiency, hitting just 39.8% of his shots from the field and just 29.3% from three-point range.
He played well when it mattered the most in the NCAA Tournament, however, averaging 13.8 points across four games. Akins doesn’t project as an NBA player as it stands today. In order for him to turn that sentiment around, he’ll have to find his shooting stroke (he made 42.2% of his threes as a sophomore) and improve his agility.
He was fine athletically in the Big Ten, but there’s a massive step up from that in the NBA. He was a solid team defender as part of Michigan State’s stifling defense, but wasn’t particularly special defending on the ball.
His ceiling is low, as Akins’ best bet is catching onto the bottom of an NBA rotation and carving out a couple years in the league.
