Neszed-Mobile-header-logo
Monday, July 28, 2025
Newszed-Header-Logo
HomeNFLNFL Insider Hints at Shocking Reason Behind Raiders’ Decision to Release Christian...

NFL Insider Hints at Shocking Reason Behind Raiders’ Decision to Release Christian Wilkins and Save $35,200,000

The Christian Wilkins situation just took a dramatic turn. What started as a straightforward injury dispute between the Las Vegas Raiders and their $110 million defensive tackle has morphed into something far murkier. New reports suggest the real reason behind his shocking release might have nothing to do with foot rehab protocols and everything to do with what happened behind closed doors.

Dive into PFSN's FREE Mock Draft Simulator and run a mock by yourself or with your friends!
Dive into PFSN’s FREE Mock Draft Simulator and run a mock by yourself or with your friends!

What Really Led to Christian Wilkins’ Sudden Departure from Vegas?

The initial narrative seemed clear enough. The Raiders released Wilkins after disagreements over how to manage his foot injury. But as NFL insider Josina Anderson reported through The Exhibit, the story runs deeper than rehab schedules.

“Some league sources believe an incident involving a teammate may have factored in-part into the Raiders’ fatigue and release of defensive tackle Christian Wilkins, beyond the management of his foot injury as the reported predominant cause,” Anderson revealed. The plot thickens when you consider that one league source described the incident as Wilkins “just playing around.”

That description raises more questions than it answers. What constitutes “playing around” in an NFL locker room? How serious was this incident if it contributed to a franchise cutting ties with a player they just handed a massive contract?

The timing of these revelations creates an uncomfortable contradiction with the Raiders’ public messaging. Head coach Pete Carroll praised Wilkins’ work ethic as recently as May, saying, “Every day he’s here early, working hard… But it has been challenging.” Those comments painted a picture of mutual effort and patience, not the contentious relationship that would typically lead to such a drastic decision.

How Might the Raiders Justify Voiding $35.2 Million?

The financial implications make this story even more compelling. NBC Sports’ Mike Florio provided crucial insight into the Raiders’ potential strategy, suggesting they could attempt to justify the release by framing it around conduct rather than injury management.

“Or, more accurately, that the Raiders could try to point to something other than a disagreement over how to repair the injury to justify not paying him more than $35.2 million in remaining guaranteed money,” Florio wrote.

This approach would mirror the Baltimore Ravens’ handling of Earl Thomas in 2020. That situation involved the Ravens using conduct-detrimental language to release Thomas without paying his guaranteed salary after a training camp altercation.

The distinction matters enormously in NFL contract law. While “full guarantees” typically protect players from injury, skill, or salary cap releases, they don’t shield players from misconduct claims. If the Raiders can successfully argue that Wilkins’ behavior harmed the team, they might escape paying the remaining guaranteed money.

However, Anderson’s reporting complicates this narrative. She noted that “Wilkins had not received any documented write-ups from the club that they’re aware of since being signed to a four-year $110 million deal in 2024.” The absence of formal disciplinary action makes it harder for the Raiders to build a case around repeated misconduct.

The legal battle ahead will likely center on proving that Wilkins’ approach to his injury recovery was unreasonable and detrimental to the team. As Anderson reported, a league source indicated the Raiders will need to demonstrate that his handling of the injury “was unreasonable, ineffective, and posed a major obstacle to his continued participation.”

That’s a significant burden of proof, especially when dealing with medical situations where players typically have considerable input into their treatment plans. The fact that Carroll publicly praised Wilkins’ dedication further complicates the Raiders’ position.

Others around the league have questioned why the Raiders didn’t explore less drastic measures before choosing termination. Suspensions, fines, or other disciplinary actions typically precede such extreme steps, particularly with players carrying large contracts.

The grievance process will likely reveal more details about both the teammate incident and the injury management dispute. Until then, the NFL community watches as one of the league’s most surprising roster moves plays out in what promises to be a contentious legal battle.

For now, Wilkins finds himself in football limbo while the Raiders prepare to defend a decision that could save them tens of millions of dollars or cost them significantly more if they lose the grievance. The truth behind this messy situation may finally emerge in the coming months, but the damage to both sides appears already done.



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments