In this exclusive interview, we sit down with Rajesh Sura, Head of Data Engineering & Analytics for North America Stores at Amazon, to explore his journey from early work in business intelligence to building AI-driven platforms that influence decisions on a global scale. Rajesh reflects on breakthroughs that redefined enterprise systems, the balance between innovation and governance, and the evolving role of data engineers in an AI-first world. He also shares insights on mentorship, research, and the future of human–AI collaboration.
Explore more interviews here: Dr. Robert Murphy, Chief Economist at infineo — Austrian Economics in AI Finance, Life Insurance Digitization, Human-AI Synergy, Blockchain Trust, Client Skepticism, and the Future of Value & Risk
Early Inspiration: Imagine stepping into the early days of your career. What first drew you into the world of data, and did you ever imagine it would evolve into the AI-driven frontier you now lead?
I began my career building traditional business intelligence systems—reports, ETL pipelines, and data warehouses that gave teams visibility into their operations. At the time, data was mainly seen as a support function, a way to describe what had already happened. But I quickly noticed the limits. Reports arrived too late, adoption was low, and the impact on real decisions was unclear. That frustration pushed me to look deeper into data engineering.
I began redesigning systems to handle more data at faster speeds. We moved legacy on-premise platforms into cloud pipelines, shifted reporting to in-memory analytics, and built automated insight engines for global scale. These changes cut infrastructure costs by seventy percent, reduced refresh times from hours to minutes, and saved nearly a million hours each year through automation.
What inspired me most was the idea of moving from hindsight to foresight. Over time, I built AI-driven systems powered by machine learning, natural language processing, and multimodal analytics that integrated structured and unstructured data. Today, these platforms empower tens of thousands of professionals to interact with data naturally and influence decisions worth hundreds of billions.
Looking back, those early frustrations with static reporting planted the seed for everything I do today—building intelligent, responsible systems that give people the confidence to make timely, informed decisions.
Breakthrough Moments: Across more than 16 years of innovation, could you share a defining moment when a major technical breakthrough you led transformed a business challenge into a scalable, intelligent solution?
One breakthrough was turning decision-making from slow reporting into live guidance. We built a conversational analytics layer on top of petabyte-scale stores so leaders could ask a question in plain language and get a precise answer with explanations. The system combined structured transactions with unstructured text and external market signals. It understood selection needs, pricing sensitivity, and promotion lift. It reasoned over inventory, vendor performance, and customer segments. When someone asked which assortment to expand for a season, the platform returned a recommended selection mix, the expected return on investment, and the drivers behind the suggestion.
We also created vendor growth recommendations that looked across billions of rows to spot underserved demand and supplier potential. The models weighed vendor reliability, margin, lead time, and regional trends, then suggested faster onboarding and how to stage deals and promotions. Leaders could simulate decisions before they acted and see the decision science impact scores and return estimates. The cultural change was immediate. Meetings shifted from debating charts to deciding on actions and tradeoffs
Another moment came when we replaced manual reporting with an always-on insights engine. A natural language interface wrote the queries, joined the right tables, and traced data lineage so trust stayed high. RPA removed the manual extract and refresh steps. AI-based observability watched every pipeline and flagged drift, schema breaks, or suspicious spikes at ingestion. With those guardrails, adoption crossed tens of thousands of users, and the tools influenced outcomes measured in the hundreds of billions. The speed up was dramatic, and the saving of human hours was measured in the hundreds of thousands, approaching a million over time. Costs fell sharply as we leaned on cloud elasticity and native services.
These advances worked because we treated intelligence and governance as a single design. Every answer came with a why. Every recommendation carried an explanation, a confidence level, and a clear trail from source to result. That made scale possible.
Cross-functional Leadership: What have been some of the most complex enterprise-wide initiatives you have led, and what leadership principles guided its success?
The most complex initiatives are those that ask people, process, and technology to change together while the business keeps running at full speed.
One example is a migration from PeopleSoft HR to SAP across multiple regions. We ran systems in parallel and reconciled records continuously. We designed rollback paths and verified payroll calculations in real time. The plan treated communication as a first-class workstream. We briefed managers well in advance, staged training for every role, and set up white glove support during cutover. Precision and empathy had to move together.
Another example is moving from large on-premises Oracle estates into native AWS data pipelines at the petabyte scale. We redesigned schemas for columnar stores, used streaming to reduce batch windows, and automated change data capture. We separated hot and warm paths, so time-sensitive decisions ran on event streams, while heavy joins ran on elastic compute that could scale out. The result was a seventy percent reduction in infrastructure cost and refresh times that fell from hours to minutes.
Modernizing SAP BW into HANA solved a different problem: the need for in-memory speed and real-time modeling. We rebuilt complex logic inside HANA so analysts could explore billions of rows without waiting. In parallel, we implemented a centralized Tableau platform so teams could leave spreadsheet-based reporting behind and share governed, consistent views. These programs solved distinct needs, performance, and usability, and together they shifted the culture toward self-service with trust.
We also deployed AI-powered data observability. Classic monitors could not keep pace with hundreds of pipelines. We trained models to watch distributions, completeness, and freshness, and to predict failures before they happened. Alerts triggered at ingestion, not after a downstream report broke. That saved thousands of hours of rework and kept confidence high.
Finally, we delivered a real-time customer segmentation and personalization engine. It fused transactions with reviews and browsing signals, combined with external intelligence like regional demand and seasonality. Marketing and merchandising used it to target promotions, shape pricing, and guide vendor selection. Adoption only worked because we explained how each recommendation was produced. I spent time in frontline sessions showing teams what variables mattered and where the data came from.
Three principles guided all of this. Resilience, since large programs always hit surprises. Trust, since people change their behavior only when they believe the system is fair and reliable. Vision, since migrations and new platforms are not the end, they are the foundation for the next wave of intelligence.
From ML-Enhanced BI to Human–AI Partnership: You’ve built AI-enabled reporting systems and predictive growth tools that merged machine learning with traditional BI. How did this change business outcomes, and looking ahead, how do you envision the evolving partnership between humans and AI in decision-making ecosystems?
Traditional BI was designed to explain what happened, but it rarely predicted what might happen next. That’s where machine learning became transformative.
We created models that analyzed billions of transactions alongside external signals like customer sentiment and competitive benchmarks. These insights were layered back into BI dashboards, now enhanced with natural language capabilities. Leaders no longer had to sift through static charts. They could ask in plain English, “What will be the ROI of bundling these products for this segment?” and receive a clear, prescriptive recommendation.
This shifted BI from hindsight to foresight. Leaders could simulate outcomes, test strategies, and see predicted impacts before committing. Adoption doubled, manual analysis workloads shrank by hundreds of thousands of hours, and decisions influenced tens of billions in outcomes. It proved that when BI and ML converge, decision-making fundamentally changes.
Looking ahead, this is only the first step in the human–AI partnership. The future will be defined by systems that are not just reactive but proactive. AI will surface anomalies before humans ask, recommend strategies in real time, and even simulate multiple scenarios to show trade-offs. Humans, however, remain essential. AI brings speed and scale, but people provide judgment, creativity, and empathy. In vendor–customer ecosystems, for example, AI might analyze demand signals and recommend which vendors to prioritize, while humans negotiate terms, manage relationships, and ensure inclusivity.
The relationship will become symbiotic. AI will act as an ever-present advisor, embedded in CRMs, collaboration platforms, and decision intelligence systems. Humans will act as strategists, choosing how to interpret and apply recommendations. Together, they will create ecosystems that are smarter, fairer, and more resilient.
For me, the key lesson is that AI doesn’t replace human decision-making—it enhances it. By merging ML with BI, and by designing for partnership, we’ve moved from dashboards to dialogue, and from reporting to responsibility. That’s the future I see: a balance where humans and AI collaborate to make decisions that are not only faster and more profitable, but also fair and inclusive.
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: Many organizations struggle to scale AI solutions past pilot projects. From your experience, what are the critical ingredients that turn a proof-of-concept into sustained business impact, and how do you balance innovation with governance along the way?
Pilots are relatively easy—they run in controlled conditions, with curated datasets and limited users. The real challenge is scaling AI into messy, petabyte-scale environments where thousands of people depend on the outputs daily.
Three ingredients make scaling possible. The first is governance. Without explainability, lineage, and compliance, adoption collapses quickly. Every model and pipeline I’ve scaled includes embedded audit trails, access demarcations, and AI-powered observability so that issues are caught before they propagate.
The second is integration. Pilots often sit in silos. We made sure AI systems were embedded directly into the tools people already used—CRM systems like Salesforce or visualization platforms like Tableau. This way, intelligence flowed naturally into existing workflows rather than asking people to learn something entirely new.
The third is value at scale. Pilots that save a single team a few hours will never scale. We focused on initiatives that reduced infrastructure costs by seventy percent, freed up hundreds of thousands of hours, or drove tens of billions in incremental value. When outcomes are that clear, scaling becomes a necessity, not an option.
Of course, the glue that holds all of this together is balancing innovation with governance. Speed without trust is reckless. Governance without innovation is irrelevant. True scale comes when the two move together—when systems are explainable, compliant, and ethical while still delivering step-change improvements in speed, efficiency, and foresight. Regulations like GDPR and the Digital Markets Act are non-negotiable, but inclusivity goes further—it’s about ensuring that AI benefits everyone. Innovation without governance is reckless. Governance without innovation is irrelevant. The two must grow together.
This balance is why our AI platforms reached adoption across tens of thousands of users and influenced decisions worth hundreds of billions. People trusted the recommendations because they understood them, and they embraced the systems because the value was undeniable. That trust, more than any algorithm, is what turns a proof-of-concept into a transformation.
The Future of the Data Engineer and NLP: With AI, automation, and natural language processing reshaping how we work, how do you see the role of a data engineer evolving over the next decade, and what capabilities should organizations start building today?
The role of the data engineer is expanding from pipeline builder to decision intelligence architect. Automation already handles many repetitive tasks, from anomaly detection to SQL generation and pipeline documentation. Engineers of the future will focus less on producing reports and more on designing intelligent ecosystems that integrate structured and unstructured data, manage billions of rows in real time, and embed machine learning directly into workflows.
Natural language processing will accelerate this shift. For decades, business leaders depended on analysts to translate their questions into SQL or dashboards. With NLP, anyone can ask a question in plain language and get an immediate, trusted answer. That is transformative—but it also changes what engineers are accountable for. Instead of writing every query, engineers must ensure the underlying systems deliver accurate, explainable, and compliant outputs when non-technical users interact with them.
This means engineers will increasingly act as curators of intelligence. They will design metadata frameworks so NLP systems understand context. They will implement observability tools so that anomalies are detected instantly. They will embed governance checks to ensure fairness and compliance. In short, their role becomes less about “building reports” and more about building trust at scale.
Organizations need to prepare for this future now. They should invest in metadata management, governance frameworks, explainability tools, and cultural readiness. Without these foundations, NLP systems will struggle to gain adoption, and data engineers will remain stuck in tactical rather than strategic roles. Looking ahead, the best data engineers will be part developer, part scientist, and part ethicist. They will not only design for speed and performance, but also for fairness, inclusivity, and trust. And as NLP becomes the new language of decision-making, engineers will be the architects ensuring that this power is used responsibly.
Research, Publications, and Scholarship: You have authored more than 20 publications, reviewed over 100 manuscripts, and served on editorial boards. How have these experiences shaped your perspective as both a practitioner and a thought leader?
Scholarship has always grounded my practice in rigor. Over the years, I have authored more than 20 publications across journals, conferences, and thought leadership platforms.
In enterprise scalability, I explored petabyte-scale migrations, scalable AI pipelines, and ROI measurement frameworks. In generative AI and automation, I published on SQL automation, automated code generation, and multimodal reasoning in virtual assistants. In trust and responsibility, my work covered explainable AI, blockchain-based security systems, and federated learning, and addressed how ethics and privacy must be embedded in AI by design. and. In sustainability, I contributed papers on green cloud computing and AI for climate responsibility. I also explored applied AI through research on customer churn prediction and sentiment analysis with LLMs.
At the same time, I’ve reviewed over 100 manuscripts for IEEE, Springer, Elsevier, and other indexed journals, and served on editorial boards and program committees. Reviewing sharpened my eye for rigor and reminded me that technology carries consequences. These lessons directly shape how I build systems in practice—always balancing innovation with responsibility.
What I value most is how research and practice reinforce each other. Industry challenges inspire scholarship, and scholarship gives me the discipline to solve them responsibly. This dual perspective has allowed me not only to build large-scale systems but to contribute to the global community shaping AI’s future.
Mentorship and Advice: Mentorship and thought leadership are central to your journey. What advice would you offer to young professionals aiming to build impactful careers at the intersection of AI, data engineering, and business intelligence?
The first piece of advice is to master fundamentals. Do not chase every new framework. Focus on principles like system design, data structures, and ethical responsibility. Tools change, but principles endure.
Second, scale your thinking. Writing a good script is valuable, but designing a system that processes billions of rows in real time is transformative. Study architectures, cloud platforms, and distributed systems.
Third, seek mentorship and build community. Surround yourself with people who challenge and guide you. Share your own knowledge with others. Growth accelerates when it is collective.
Fourth, fight imposter syndrome. Everyone starts somewhere. Progress comes from persistence and curiosity. Keep experimenting, keep asking questions, and trust your growth.
Finally, focus on impact. Ask how your work improves decisions, saves time, or creates fairness. AI is powerful, but its true measure is how it serves people.
Global Recognition and Judging: Your leadership extends beyond building systems—you have judged more than 500 projects across hackathons and awards worldwide. How has this judging experience influenced your perspective on innovation, and what patterns do you see in the next generation of AI solutions?
Judging has been one of the most inspiring aspects of my career. I’ve evaluated projects across global hackathons, student competitions, and enterprise awards.
It reminded me that creativity is everywhere. I’ve seen students build sentiment analysis engines, startups design healthcare AI, and global teams tackle sustainability challenges. Innovation is not limited by geography or resources. It also sharpened my sense of impact. Many projects are technically brilliant but lack scalability or governance. Others seem simple but have the potential to transform industries. That balance—originality plus impact—is what I now seek in every system I design.
Finally, judging gave me a front-row seat to emerging trends. I see more projects focused on fairness, sustainability, multimodal AI, federated learning, and edge intelligence. The next generation is not only building smarter systems but also more responsible ones.
For me, judging is not about scoring alone. It’s about mentoring participants, offering feedback, and encouraging ideas that may one day shape the industry. That dialogue ensures the ecosystem keeps growing in the right direction.
Your Vision Forward: Looking ahead 5–10 years, how do you envision the relationship between humans and AI evolving, and what legacy do you hope to leave in shaping responsible, inclusive, and intelligent systems for the next generation?
Looking ahead, I see the relationship between humans and AI becoming a true partnership. AI will take on the scale, speed, and pattern recognition that no human can match, while people will bring judgment, empathy, and creativity. In the next 5 to 10 years, I believe AI will act as an always-present advisor, surfacing risks and opportunities in real time, and humans will focus on interpreting those signals, weighing trade-offs, and making decisions grounded in values. The future will not be about replacement, but about amplification, machines and people working together to create smarter, fairer, and more resilient ecosystems.
The legacy I hope to leave is one of empowerment. I want to be remembered not only for building systems that influenced decisions a global scale, but for creating platforms that gave every professional the ability to use data with confidence and clarity. I hope my mentorship continues to live on in the leaders I have guided, and that my contributions in research and peer review have helped raise the bar for rigor and responsibility in our field. Above all, I want my work to show that intelligence at scale can be both powerful and fair, and that AI, when designed responsibly, can create a transparent, inclusive, and human-centered future.
Closing Thoughts
From migrating petabyte-scale systems and building AI-powered pipelines to publishing scholarly works and mentoring professionals globally, Rajesh Sura has consistently combined technical brilliance with responsibility. His journey demonstrates what is possible when data and AI are designed not only for performance but also for trust, inclusivity, and human progress.
In an era defined by artificial intelligence, Rajesh is shaping not just technology but the principles by which technology serves society.
