Neszed-Mobile-header-logo
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Newszed-Header-Logo
HomeAI7 Advanced Feature Engineering Tricks for Text Data Using LLM Embeddings

7 Advanced Feature Engineering Tricks for Text Data Using LLM Embeddings

7 Advanced Feature Engineering Tricks for Text Data Using LLM Embeddings

7 Advanced Feature Engineering Tricks for Text Data Using LLM Embeddings
Image by Editor

Introduction

Large language models (LLMs) are not only good at understanding and generating text; they can also turn raw text into numerical representations called embeddings. These embeddings are useful for incorporating additional information into traditional predictive machine learning models—such as those used in scikit-learn—to improve downstream performance.

This article presents seven advanced Python examples of feature engineering tricks that add extra value to text data by leveraging LLM-generated embeddings, thereby enhancing the accuracy and robustness of downstream machine learning models that rely on text, in applications such as sentiment analysis, topic classification, document clustering, and semantic similarity detection.

Common setup for all examples

Unless stated otherwise, the seven example tricks below make use of this common setup. We rely on Sentence Transformers for embeddings and scikit-learn for modeling utilities.

1. Combining TF-IDF and Embedding Features

The first example shows how to jointly extract—given a source text dataset like fetch_20newsgroups—both TF-IDF and LLM-generated sentence-embedding features. We then combine these feature types to train a logistic regression model that classifies news texts based on the combined features, often boosting accuracy by capturing both lexical and semantic information.

2. Topic-Aware Embedding Clusters

This trick takes a few sample text sequences, generates embeddings using the preloaded language model, applies K-Means clustering on these embeddings to assign topics, and then combines the embeddings with a one-hot encoding of each example’s cluster identifier (its “topic class”) to build a new feature representation. It is a useful strategy for creating compact topic meta-features.

3. Semantic Anchor Similarity Features

This simple strategy computes similarity to a small set of fixed “anchor” (or reference) sentences used as compact semantic descriptors—essentially, semantic landmarks. Each column in the similarity-feature matrix contains the similarity of the text to one anchor. The main value lies in allowing the model to learn relationships between the text’s similarity to key concepts and a target variable—useful for text classification models.

4. Meta-Feature Stacking via Auxiliary Sentiment Classifier

For text associated with labels such as sentiments, the following feature-engineering technique adds extra value. A meta-feature is built as the prediction probability returned by an auxiliary classifier trained on the embeddings. This meta-feature is stacked with the original embeddings, resulting in an augmented feature set that can improve downstream performance by exposing potentially more discriminative information than raw embeddings alone.

A slight additional setup is needed for this example:

5. Embedding Compression and Nonlinear Expansion

This strategy applies PCA dimensionality reduction to compress the raw embeddings built by the LLM and then polynomially expands these compressed embeddings. It may sound odd at first, but this can be an effective approach to capture nonlinear structure while maintaining efficiency.

6. Relational Learning with Pairwise Contrastive Features

The goal here is to build pairwise relational features from text embeddings. Interrelated features—constructed in a contrastive fashion—can highlight aspects of similarity and dissimilarity. This is particularly effective for predictive processes that inherently entail comparisons among texts.

7. Cross-Modal Fusion

The last trick combines LLM embeddings with simple linguistic or numeric features—such as punctuation ratio or other domain-specific engineered features. It contributes to more holistic text-derived features by uniting semantic signals with handcrafted linguistic aspects. Here is an example that measures punctuation in the text.

Wrapping Up

We explored seven advanced feature-engineering tricks that help extract more information from raw text, going beyond LLM-generated embeddings alone. These practical strategies can boost downstream machine learning models that take text as input by capturing complementary lexical, semantic, relational, and handcrafted signals.

Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments