
After two years in a stalemate, golf’s tour wars have undergone a tactical shift.
For the first time since the infamous “merger” agreement of June 2023, both sides seem resigned to a new reality: Peace is not on the table.
The latest evidence arrived Wednesday, when two key stakeholders for the PGA Tour spoke in two very different corners of the golf world — Rory McIlroy in Dubai and Adam Scott in La Quinta, Calif. Though the two stars (and key PGA Tour political voices) were separated by more than 8,000 miles, they offered the same through line: Any hope of peaceful reunification between the PGA Tour and LIV is dim.
McIlroy was first to address the bleak state of accords with LIV and the league’s financiers at the Saudi Public Investment Fund. Speaking from the dais at the Dubai Desert Classic on Wednesday morning, he said that while reunification was the easiest path to bringing golf’s best players back together, it was also the most unlikely.
“Well, it matters — I think it matters,” McIlroy said of the prospect of reunification. “I would say that’s Solution A. It matters, but I just don’t see a world where it can happen at this point.”
Almost 12 hours later, from the range at the American Express in California, Scott shared a similar sentiment.
“It seems like they’re worlds apart,” Scott told Golf Channel’s Todd Lewis. “They operate very differently from a starting point. There’s a contract to play one, [not] at the other. I would say they’re incompatible at the moment and that’s been the case. There’s been talks for years now about it. And that’s fine, I think people have gotten used to each organization going about their business now.”
It should be noted that pessimism is not the same thing as confirmation. The LIV era has taught us that prerogatives and incentives are liable to change quickly — and with little warning. But both players have been key dignitaries on the Tour side over the last several years, and remain plugged in to the happenings on the PGA Tour side of the ledger.
Scott, who serves on the Tour’s policy board, was one of only a small handful in attendance at a pivotal Oval Office meeting with representatives from both tours and President Trump, which seems to have pushed both sides further away from a deal.
He has also been a centerpiece of several iterations of changes to the Tour aimed at strengthening its standing in the LIV era. The latest round of those changes — a new “returning member program” aimed at providing a temporary pathway back to the PGA Tour for four of LIV’s biggest stars — has already yielded a breakthrough. Five-time major champion Brooks Koepka will return to the Tour at next week’s Farmers Insurance Open, the first LIV star to return after defection.
“I’m excited to see Brooks come back and play,” Scott said. “He’s a five-time major champion. It’s going to be fantastic to see him playing Torrey back in a Tour event. Who would’ve thought a few years ago? I don’t think anybody would have thought it would have happened.”
Koepka’s return was a pivot for the PGA Tour. For the first time, the Tour showed a willingness to bend its rules around suspensions and fines for LIV’s true needle-movers. It also suggested that the Tour’s current strategy for reunification is actually pretty simple: Wait out the big fish and, once you land them, let the rest take care of itself.
Of course, that’s assuming the big fish want to head back to the PGA Tour. That’s the Tour’s hope, but it’s still anybody’s guess, particularly with stars like Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau still under contract with LIV.
The Tour has been accused of leaning on hope as a strategy in the LIV era. In many ways, it was the animating thesis of the June 6 agreement and again with the “returning member program.”
But in lieu of a negotiating partner, hope might not be the worst strategy for the Tour in 2026. At the very least, it seems a lot more feasible than peace.
“I don’t see a world where the two or three sides or whoever it is will give up enough,” McIlroy said. “For reunification to happen, every side is going to feel like they will have lost, where you really want every side to feel like they have won. I think they are just too far apart for that to happen.”

