New Freedom of Information (FOI) documents confirm what many long suspected: The UK government secretly used popular soap operas likeĀ EastEndersĀ andĀ Coronation StreetĀ to push vaccine propaganda during the pandemic, raising urgent questions about how much influence the state holds over British media, and how far officials are willing to go to manipulate public thought, opinion and behavior under the guise of public health.
The findings echo May 2021Ā revelationsĀ that scientists on the UK governmentās behavioral advisory committee admitted they used fear-based ātotalitarianā tactics to control public behavior during COVID-19, describing the approach as āunethical,ā ādystopian,ā and a form of āmind control.ā
They also mirror an October 2024 U.S. House investigation thatĀ foundĀ the CDC and Biden administration used a $900 million COVID campaign to āmanipulate Americansā with ādeeply flawedā messaging, āoverpromisingā vaccines āwithout evidence,ā and funding Big Tech companies to ātrack and monitor Americans.ā
What other views and choices are being shaped today by government-scripted entertainment?
Ministers Pushed BBC & ITV to Insert Vaccine Storylines
āMinisters met television bosses during the pandemic to persuade them to push pro-vaccine storylines in soaps such asĀ EastEndersĀ andĀ Coronation Street, it has emerged,āĀ The TelegraphĀ reported last week.
The effort was led by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), which held secret meetings with ITV, BBC, Channel 4 and others to coordinate ānational unity programming.ā
FOI documents show broadcasters were asked: āif there were plans to introduce health messages into soap stories.ā
BBC committed to āreport back re other showsā while ITV responded that āfilming had now ceased,ā but that āITV have included voiceovers to episodes now to clarify govt messaging re social distancing.ā
Early Meetings with ITV in February 2020
Redacted records show that as early as Feb. 2, 2020āmore than a month before lockdownāofficials met ITV chief Dame Carolyn McCall to ātest the possibilityā of inserting pro-vaccine messaging.
The government briefing stated:
āSince that meeting ITV have noticeably increased their engagement across DCMS and Whitehall; and recently officials at the Department of Health have been in touch with DCMS about potential assistance from ITV in relation to pro vaccine messaging. This meeting may offer an opportunity to test the possibility of this with them.ā
Health Department Wanted Letters to Broadcasters
Documents confirm the Department of Health wanted to write directly to ITV to āinclude vaccine storylines in their soaps.ā
But DCMS advised against it:
āWhilst we do not think it would be appropriate to write to ITV on this matter given the importance of broadcastersā operational and editorial independence, you may wish to explore with them whether they already have plans to develop content related to this area.ā
Officials also noted ITV was āplanning soap storylines related to the environment and climate change and therefore they may be amenable to the idea of something similar in relation to vaccine messaging.ā
BBC & Channel 4 Also Involved
In March and April 2020, then-Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden and then-Media Minister John Whittingdale met with BBC Director-General Tony Hall, ITVās Dame Carolyn McCall, and Channel 4 CEO Alex Mahon.
Channel 4 agreed it would āreinforce Public Health England guidanceā and target younger viewers through YouTube.
Mahon told officials:
āAM said they will consider how to spread message through YouTube excerpts of news programmes (C4ās YouTube channel has attracted 100 million views) and through social media. Also C4 is considering filming broadcast messages from hosts and talent to reinforce messaging.ā
Pro-Vaccine Propaganda Aired onĀ EastEnders
āPro-vaccine messaging did end up in soaps.ā
In a 2021 episode of EastEnders: āPatrick Trueman told Suki Panesar he felt like he had āwon the lotteryā after getting his second vaccination.ā
During the same scene: āKaren Taylor was accused of being an āanti-vaxxerā for worrying that they had developed the vaccine too quickly.ā
Critics Blast State Interference in British Media
Sir David Davis MP condemned the effort:
āWhat this demonstrates is that during Covid, the government reduced the broadcasters to mere arms of the state.ā
āOf course, it was important to tell the public about the efficacy and safety of vaccines, but the state should never resort to underhanded propaganda of this nature.ā
Lord Frost added:
āIf, as it seems, the government quietly worked behind the scenes with major broadcasters to shape opinions and compliance on their draconian Covid-19 measures, this is extremely worrying.ā
āActions like this blur the boundary between government, civil society, and private life. They risk undermining confidence in government messaging in the future, and border on the unethical in a free society.ā
Injuries Acknowledged but Concerns Suppressed
āMore than 17,500 Britons have applied to the Governmentās vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS) believing they or loved ones were injured by the jab.ā
āMost of the successful vaccine harm claims relate to the AstraZeneca jab, which was found to cause vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, a dangerous type of blood clotting which can be fatal.ā
Dodsworth: āThatās Not Public Health, Itās Propagandaā
Author Laura Dodsworth said:
āThe government was in close contact with broadcasters to ensure the ārightā messages made it into entertainment ā thatās not public health, itās propaganda.ā
āTake EastEnders. Patrick and Suki dutifully pushed the jab, while āKarenā (white, and literally named Karen) voiced concerns and was ridiculed. It was heavy-handed, awkward and divisive. Propaganda often works by polarisation: creating in-groups and out-groups to shut down debate. Thereās a word for this: manipulation.ā
Academics & Campaigners Warn of Collusion
Dr. Colin Alexander of Nottingham Trent University stated:
āWhat the FoI request information thus confirms is that broadcasters relinquished their primary democratic role of holding the powerful to account and instead became collusive with the official narrative.ā
āThis at a time when scrutiny and investigation ought to have been at its highest.ā
Molly Kingsley of UsForThem added:
āThis kind of brazen state interference with British media crosses multiple red lines.ā
āIt indicates that the state-led pandemic censorship operation extended beyond āmerelyā social media, and it raises serious questions about the integrity of messages broadcast to the public during the pandemic.ā
ITV & BBC Respond
ITV said:
āAll of this was entirely editorially independent of the Government and any other body or interest group.ā
A BBC spokesman said:
āThe BBC is independent and makes its own editorial decisions. This does not mean that we cannot meet representatives from the government or from political parties, and, like other broadcasters, we do so.ā
āWeāre Being Entertained Into Complianceā
Dodsworth concluded:
āThereās a growing trend of public policy delivered through storylines ā weāre being entertained into compliance. What better to wash your brain with than with a soap?ā
And if the government quietly weaponized entertainment to coerce pandemic compliance, how else is this machinery being used?
If vaccine propaganda was planted in prime time without public knowledge, what other narratives are now shaping public thought, behavior, and consent?
Loading…